Are Validity and Reliability "Relevant" in Qualitative Evaluation Research?

Author:

Goodwin Laura D.1,Goodwin William L.2

Affiliation:

1. School of Education, University of Colorado at Denver; School of Nursing, University of Colorado, Health Sciences Center

2. School of Education, University of Colorado at Denver

Abstract

Interest in and use of qualitative methodological strategies in evaluation research have increased considerably in the last few years. Many of the recent evaluationframe-works or models are entirely or partly oriented toward use of qualitative methods. A number of methodological issues and concerns have been raised, including the appropriateness of validity and reliability estimation for the measurement strategies employed in qualitative evaluations becoming more common in health and other fields. In this article, the views of prominent qualitative methodologists on this topic are briefly summarized; a case is madefor the relevance of validity and reliability estimation; definitions of validity and reliability for qualitative measurement are presented; and appropriate estimation techniques are suggested. It is hoped that discussions such as this will promote increased attention to validity and reliability concerns in qualitative evaluations and thus help improve the quality of those evaluations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 53 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The development of health literacy scale for acute complications of diabetes for children with type 1 diabetes (8–12 years);Journal of Pediatric Nursing;2024-09

2. Validity in Measures and Data Collection;Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology;2023

3. Validity in Evaluation Designs and Methods;Credibility, Validity, and Assumptions in Program Evaluation Methodology;2023

4. What does it mean for an evaluation to be ‘valid’? A critical synthesis of evaluation literature;Evaluation and Program Planning;2022-04

5. Feeling included and excluded in organizations: The role of human and social capital;Journal of Business Research;2022-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3