Affiliation:
1. Institute
for Program Evaluation, Roanoke, Virginia
Abstract
Loss of follow-up information regarding the adjustment of people who have received mental health services has been a troublesome problem when comparing the effectiveness of different treatment programs. The primary concern has been that a low response rate may indicate that patients are adjusting poorly. If this were true, then the treatment effectiveness ofprograms having low follow-up response rates would be overestimated. The present study compares the follow-up adjustment of patients on whom information was obtained by mail with the adjustment of mail nonresponders who were later interviewed by phone. The findings indicate that the posthospital adjustment of patients was not a significant factor in determining whether or not mailed follow-up questionnaires were returned. Rather, low response rates were primarily a function of data collector style and motivation level of those receiving mailed questionnaires.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献