Affiliation:
1. Psychology
Department, Northwestern University
2. Department
of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School and Psychology Department,
Wheaton College
Abstract
This paper discusses the evaluation of innovations in health care technology using an illustrative example drawn from computerized electrocardiography. It focuses on the increasing role of such soft technologies that involve computer- assisted diagnostic problem-solving. The purpose is not only to present one evaluative methodology, but also to detect any unanticipated side effects. Since knowledge of the patient's true state is usually not possible in these situations, an alternative evaluative approach has been used to assess the automated system. It is argued that if computer-physician agreement is as high or higher than that between different physicians or the same physician over time, then the computer is interpreting electrocardiograms on an equal par with physicians even though at times both could be wrong. By this criterion, computer interpretation was judged as inadequate for one of five diagnostic classifications. In addition, it was found that the computer systematically biased the judgment of those physicians previously unfamiliar with computerized electrocardiography.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献