Commentary: The Problems of Grouping All Adversity Into a Special Populations Label

Author:

Sussman Steve123ORCID,Kattari Shanna K.4,Baezconde-Garbanati Lourdes15,Glackin Shane N.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

3. School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

4. School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

5. Department of Sociology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

6. Department of Sociology, Philosophy, and Anthropology, University of Exeter, UK

Abstract

“Special populations” refer to groups of people whose needs are not fully addressed by traditional health services delivery. Greater access to these services, or tailored services, must be provided to reduce inequities in physical and mental health-care systems. Many different groups have been identified as special populations. We comment on controversies regarding the use of the term special populations in health practice and policy. Applicable conceptual issues include intersectionality, unitization, definitional drawbacks, and looping effects. There is a need to make clear the challenges posed by use of this term (e.g., discrimination, workability). An approach that acknowledges the diversity of groups and accommodates them where necessary without discrimination and unequal treatment is needed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Supportive and Affirming Queer Perinatal Health Care: A Qualitative Study;LGBTQ+ Family: An Interdisciplinary Journal;2023-08-02

2. Substance and Behavioral Addictions, and Their Consequences among Vulnerable Populations;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2022-05-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3