Clinical Outcomes, Utilization, and Charges in Persons With Neck Pain Receiving Guideline Adherent Physical Therapy

Author:

Horn Maggie E.1,Brennan Gerard P.2,George Steven Z.34,Harman Jeffrey S.5,Bishop Mark D.3

Affiliation:

1. School of Physical Therapy, Langston University, Langston, OK, USA

2. Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

3. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

4. Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL, USA

5. Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

Abstract

In efforts to decrease practice variation, clinical practice guidelines for neck pain have been published. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of receiving guideline adherent physical therapy (PT) on clinical outcomes, health care utilization, and charges for health care services in patients with neck pain. A retrospective review of 298 patients with neck pain receiving PT from 2008 to 2011 was performed. Clinical outcomes, utilization, and charges were compared between patients who received guideline adherent care and nonadherent care. Patients in the adherent care group experienced a lower percentage improvement in pain score compared to nonadherent care group ( p = .01), but groups did not significantly differ on percentage improvement in disability ( p = .32). However, patients receiving adherent care had an average 3.6 fewer PT visits ( p < .001) and less charges for PT ( p < .001). Additionally, patients receiving adherent care had 7.3 fewer visits to other health care providers ( p < .001), one less prescription medication ( p = .02) and 43% fewer diagnostic images ( p = .02) but did not differ in their charges to other health care providers ( p = .68) during the calendar year of undergoing PT. Although receiving guideline adherent care demonstrated positive effects on health care utilization and financial outcomes, there appears to be a trade-off with clinical outcomes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3