Comparing Long- Versus Short-Forms of Depression Scales in an Omnibus Longitudinal Survey

Author:

Wu Qiong1,Qian Haozhi2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Social Science Survey, Peking University, Beijing, China

2. Department of Sociology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Abstract

Many large scale omnibus surveys have adopted shorter versions of the original lengthy psychological scales for efficiency. Evidence is lacking on the impact of different forms on respondent behaviors and data analysis. This study focuses on the widely used Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a case in point, by utilizing data from the nationally representative China Family Panel Studies. It compares CES-D20 with CES-D8 as they have been applied to two separate and equivalent groups. Our findings suggest that reducing the test length from CES-D20 to CES-D8 does not lead to a notable reduction to their psychometric qualities. Respondent behaviors as measured by survey perceptions in its concurrent wave, and attrition rates two years later are not affected by the forms. Analysis by combining data from the two forms is possible after proper conversion of the scores to be on the same metric without worrying about the form effect. In conclusion, the findings provide supporting evidence for a possible smooth transition between long and short forms of scales under proper survey designs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3