Measuring Patient-Reported Use and Outcomes From Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies: Development of the Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey

Author:

Taylor Stephanie L12ORCID,Elwy A Rani34,Bokhour Barbara G35,Coggeshall Scott S67,Cohen Amy8,Der-Martirosian Claudia19,Haderlein Taona19,Haun Jolie1011,Kligler Benjamin12ORCID,Kloehn Alex T6,Lorenz Karl A1314,Lott Briana1,Shin Marlena H3,Schult Tammy12,Toyama Joy1,Whitehead Alison M12ORCID,Zhang Xiaoyi15,Zeliadt Steven B67

Affiliation:

1. Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2. Department of Medicine and Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

3. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford, Bedford, MA, USA and VA Boston Healthcare Systems, Boston, MA, USA

4. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

5. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

6. Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA

7. Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

8. Division of Education, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, USA

9. Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, Office of Patient Care Services, North Hills, CA, USA

10. James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA

11. College of Public Health at University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

12. Office of Patient Centered Care and Cultural Transformation, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA

13. Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA

14. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

15. Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Abstract

Background Assessing the use and effectiveness of complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies via survey can be complicated given CIH therapies are used in various locations and formats, the dosing required to have an effect is unclear, the potential health and well-being outcomes are many, and describing CIH therapies can be challenging. Few surveys assessing CIH therapy use and effectiveness exist, and none sufficiently reflect these complexities. Objective In a large-scale Veterans Health Administration (VA) quality improvement effort, we developed the “Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey”, a longitudinal, electronic patient self-administered survey to comprehensively assess CIH therapy use and outcomes. Methods We obtained guidance from the literature, subject matter experts, and Veteran patients who used CIH therapies in designing the survey. As a validity check, we completed cognitive testing and interviews with those patients. We conducted the survey (March 2021-April 2023), inviting 15,608 Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain with a recent CIH appointment or referral identified in VA electronic medical records (EMR) to participate. As a second validity check, we compared VA EMR data and patient self-reports of CIH therapy utilization a month after survey initiation and again at survey conclusion. Results The 64-item, electronic survey assesses CIH dosing (amount and timing), delivery format and location, provider location, and payor. It also assesses 7 patient-reported outcomes (pain, global mental health, global physical health, depression, quality of life, stress, and meaning/purpose in life), and 3 potential mediators (perceived health competency, healthcare engagement, and self-efficacy for managing diseases). The survey took 17 minutes on average to complete and had a baseline response rate of 45.3%. We found high degrees of concordance between self-reported and EMR data for all therapies except meditation. Conclusions Validly assessing patient-reported CIH therapy use and outcomes is complex, but possible.

Funder

Department of Veterans Affairs: Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3