How Nurses Identify Hospitalized Patients on Their Personal Notes: Findings From Analyzing ‘Brains’ Headers with Multiple Raters

Author:

Sarkhel Ritesh1,Socha Jacob J.1,Mount-Campbell Austin1,Moffatt-Bruce Susan1,Fernandez Simon1,Patel Kashvi1,Nandi Arnab1,Patterson Emily S.1

Affiliation:

1. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Abstract

The overarching objective of this research is to reduce the burden of documentation in electronic health records by registered nurses in hospitals. Registered nurses have consistently reported that e-documentation is a concern with the introduction of electronic health records. As a result, many nurses use handwritten notes in order to avoid using electronic health records to access information about patients. At the top of these notes are patient identifiers. By identifying aspects of good and suboptimal headers, we can begin to form a model of how to effectively support identifying patients during assessments and care activities. The primary finding is that nurses use room number as the primary patient identifier in the hospital setting, not the patient’s last name. In addition, the last name, gender, and age are sufficiently important identifiers that they are frequently recorded at the top of handwritten notes. Clearly distinguishable field labels and values are helpful in quickly scanning the identifier for identifying information. A web based annotator was designed as a first step towards machine learning approaches to recognize handwritten or printed data on paper sheets in future research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. Provider information and resource foraging in healthcare delivery

2. IMMORMINO v. LAKE HOSPITAL SYSTEM, INC. No. 1: 13CV1818 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 31, 2015).

3. The Association of Registered Nurse Staffing Levels and Patient Outcomes

4. Klein D. E., Klein H. A., Klein G. (2000). Macrocognition: Linking cognitive psychology and cognitive ergonomics, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Interactions with Complex Systems (pp. 173-177). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

5. Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Capturing Nursing Students’ Cognitive Challenges and Efforts in EHR-related Tasks: Findings from a Thematic Analysis;Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care;2024-06

2. Improving information extraction from visually rich documents using visual span representations;Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment;2021-01

3. Nursing Handover: A Content Analysis of Nurses’ Handwritten Notes;Western Journal of Nursing Research;2020-11-22

4. Value and Usage of a Workaround Artifact: A Cognitive Work Analysis of “Brains” Use by Hospital Nurses;Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making;2019-02-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3