Using Qualitative Inquiries to Analyse the Dynamism of Factionalism

Author:

Kerr Rebecca1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University College London, London, UK

Abstract

When exploring assessments of factionalism, there is the tendency to rely on quantitative assessments based upon an institutionalised and consciously organised group. However, to rely solely on the assessment of factionalism as such undermines and dismisses much of the intra-party dialogue which facilitates, encourages or could undermine party cohesion and unity. Quantitative analysis can rely on quite static understandings of the faction; however, this research understands factionalism as dynamic and changeable dependent on a range of internal and external variables. The fluidity of the faction is demonstrated in the ways in which the faction can adopt or drop ideological positions dependent on the appetite of intra-party groups and the electorate. Its dynamism is also reflected through the different typologies of factions that exist. The dynamic forms that the faction take are exemplified through the case study analysis of the Labour Party within the UK. The Labour Party also provides an interesting analysis in understanding the wide range of external factors that factions must negotiate. This includes, but is not limited to, the changing ways in which we understand party allegiance, identity and voting patterns. Factionalism is ultimately an interpersonal event, and to accurately capture this detail, qualitative assessments are necessary.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference75 articles.

1. Abou-Chadi T (2022) Past the Point of No Return? The Future of Social Democracy in Europe. Green European Journal. Available at: https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/past-the-point-of-no-return-the-future-of-social-democracy-in-europe/ (accessed 28 January 2023).

2. Abou-Chadi T, Gingrich J (2021) It’s Not Just in Britain – Across Europe, Social Democracy Is Losing Its Way. The Observer. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/may/09/not-just-britain-across-europe-social-democracy-losing-way (accessed 28 January 2023).

3. Beckett A (2020) Keir Starmer Needs a Bolder Vision – Being the Grownup in the Room Isn’t Enough: The Labour Leader’s Minimalist, Methodical Approach Is Beating Boris Johnson’s Chaos So Far. But Where Are the Big Ideas? The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/10/keir-starmer-labour-leader-grownup-boris-johnson-chaos (accessed 9 February 2023).

4. The Study of Party Factions as Competitive Political Organizations

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3