Restricting Access to Non-Psychoactive Medications: Public Health Necessity or Disabling Professional Prerogative?

Author:

Layne Norman R.

Abstract

An obscure regulation issued in 1938 and its codification into the law in 1951 as an amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act are identified as the pivotal events that have allowed the Food and Drug Administration to restrict public access to non-psychoactive medications approved for human use in the United States. The assumptions of the framers of this legislation are analyzed, and the validity of these assumptions is evaluated. Moral entrepreneurs within the FDA lost faith in the capacity of private companies to serve the medicinal needs of the nation and in the ability of consumers to make informed decisions about medications and appointed physicians as the purchasing agents for consumers. The effects of this decision on the delivery of health care services and on the practice of self-medication in the United States are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference22 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Deregulating Mandatory Medical Prescription;American Journal of Law & Medicine;1986

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3