Attitudes and Subjective Norms Regarding Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Among Individuals in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in the Greater St. Louis Area

Author:

Filiatreau Lindsey M.1,Szlyk Hannah S.1,Kasson Erin1,Dickson Megan F.23ORCID,Banks Devin4,Winograd Rachel5,Marotta Phillip6,Cavazos-Rehg Patricia1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

2. Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

3. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

4. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri—St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

5. Missouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri—St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

6. Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

Abstract

Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is safe and efficacious for treating opioid use disorder (OUD), yet there is limited understanding of how attitudes and subjective norms regarding MOUD among individuals with OUD may impede treatment uptake. Thus, the current study describes attitudes and subjective norms in a sample of individuals with OUD in the St. Louis area ( N = 183) and compares outcomes among those who were and were not actively taking MOUD. Most endorsed positive views regarding pharmacologic treatment for OUD overall, but concerns about physical side effects, the daily nature of some MOUD options, and uncertainty about the relative risks and benefits of MOUD remained prevalent. Individuals reporting current MOUD use had more accepting attitudes and perceived subjective norms regarding MOUD compared to others, suggesting that interventions targeting improvements in the knowledge of, attitudes toward, and normalization of MOUD are needed to further improve uptake and retention in pharmacotherapy for OUD.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3