Leveraging National Data and Regional Innovations to Right-Size Tobacco Treatment Policy for Behavioral Health in a Midwestern State

Abstract

Background: People with mental health (MH) and substance use disorders (SUD) have high rates of tobacco use and tobacco-related mortality. They want to stop smoking and studies have shown they can quit, but few behavioral health facilities provide tobacco treatment. The purpose of this paper is to describe how a midwestern statewide behavioral health collaboration used regional data to pinpoint strengths and weaknesses in tobacco treatment trends, identified policies in neighboring states that were associated with high rates of tobacco treatment, and worked with state leaders to implement these policies to enhance treatment. Methods: We used publicly available data from 2 SAMHSA annual national surveys of MH/SUD facilities to describe tobacco treatment services and policies in behavioral health facilities in Kansas and 3 neighboring states (Missouri, Nebraska and Oklahoma). We interviewed neighboring state leaders to identify policies they had implemented to boost tobacco recovery services in behavioral health. We collaborated with our state behavioral health agency to encourage adoption of similar policies. Results: Using 7 years of survey data (2014-2020), rates for screening, counseling, and medications for tobacco dependence were highest in Oklahoma and Missouri facilities. Oklahoma had the highest percentages of facilities reporting smoke-free campuses. In all states, rates of tobacco service provision and smoke-free campuses were lower among SUD facilities than in MH facilities. State leaders associated several policies with high performance, including (a) requiring programs contracting with the state to conduct screening, provide counseling, and adopt smoke-free campuses (Oklahoma and Missouri); (b) state-based collection of tobacco treatment service provision data (Oklahoma); (c) providing facilities with free NRT for clients (Oklahoma); (d) setting benchmarks for service provision (Oklahoma); (e) comprehensive Medicaid coverage of cessation medications (Missouri). Upon review of these findings, Kansas behavioral health officials adopted a 2-year process to implement similar policies and are integrating tobacco treatment requirements into the state Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic program. Conclusions: Summarizing and sharing freely-available data across states laid the groundwork for cross-border networking and policy change. State and federal agencies should integrate these policies into contracts and block grants to reduce tobacco-related disparities among individuals with behavioral health conditions.