Intellectual freedom and alternative priorities in library and information science research: A longitudinal study

Author:

Gardner Gabriel J1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University Library, California State University Long Beach, USA

Abstract

This article presents a bibliometric analysis of the library and information science literature to trace the emphasis that intellectual freedom and neutrality have received relative to an index of alternative and possibly competing topics. Emphasis is captured longitudinally by recording the number of results for various search terms associated with intellectual freedom, neutrality, diversity, equity, and inclusion in Web of Science from 1993 through 2020 and Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts from 1970 through 2020. The results show that the number of works mentioning intellectual freedom and neutrality has increased only slightly over the study period, in sharp contrast to many entries on the diversity, equity, and inclusion index. With research interests being partially indicative of personal beliefs and professional activity, the impact of this relative change in emphasis on professional practice is discussed. Public controversies regarding library neutrality, intellectual freedom, and freedom of expression in libraries are summarized.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference32 articles.

1. American Library Association (2008) Code of Ethics of the American Library Association. Available at: https://www.ala.org/tools/ethics (accessed 11 June 2021).

2. American Library Association (2020) ALA statement on Executive Order on Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping. Available at: https://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2020/10/ala-statement-executive-order-combating-race-and-sex-stereotyping (accessed 22 February 2021).

3. American Library Association Council (2017) Equity, diversity, inclusion: An interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights. Available at: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill/interpretations/EDI (accessed 27 May 2021).

4. American Library Association Council (2021) Resolution to Condemn White Supremacy and Fascism as Antithetical to Library Work, CD #43. Available at: https://www.ala.org/aboutala/sites/ala.org.aboutala/files/content/ALA%20CD%2043%20Resolution%20to%20Condemn%20White%20Supremacy%20and%20Fascism%20as%20Antithetical%20to%20Library%20Work%20Final_0.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3usPV0hvotP9WnD4c69KKMiSKg8HsFjFbidA9TQPcP_cqjAgH68-GM3Y8 (accessed 26 January 2021).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3