Who Should Make Medical Decisions When a Patient Lacks an Advance Directive?

Author:

Dygert Levi1ORCID,Lewis Ariane1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Patients admitted to the hospital with neurological problems are sometimes incapacitated and unable to make end-of-life decisions. In these instances, without an advanced directive from the patient, clinicians and family members must make critical medical decisions without input from the patient. This paper looks at two cases - one child and one adult – in which neuroprognosis was uncertain, and physician and family members’ beliefs on end-of-life care clash. We provide insight into these disagreements and reflect on how best to manage them. We argue that when considering withdrawing treatment, respecting autonomy is of paramount importance, while decision-making about continuing life-sustaining treatment requires clinicians to ensure surrogates are adequately educated about the principle of beneficence.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Reference12 articles.

1. Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke

2. Friedlin J. Struggling to Die in Peace: a Family Fights to Turn off a Pacemaker. Daily News; 2019. Accessed June 21, 2021. https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-struggling-to-die-in-peace-20190716-w25njyqus5gmzpb4eyj3grpgea-story.html

3. Raqueeb vs Bart NHS Foundation Trust. Queen’s bench administrative court (Family Division). MacDonald J. Publication October 3, 2019. Accessed June 21, 2021. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Raqeeb-Judgment-Final-03.10.2019-pdf-Publication-Copy.pdf

4. American Medical Association. Code of Ethics of the American Medical Association adopted May 1847. Philadelphia; 1871. Accessed June 21, 2021. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009665790

5. A Brief Historical and Theoretical Perspective on Patient Autonomy and Medical Decision Making

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3