End-Of-Life Care in the Potential Donor after Circulatory Death: A Systematic Review

Author:

Cappucci Stefanie P12ORCID,Smith Wade S3,Schwartzstein Richard4,White Douglas B5,Mitchell Susan L26,Fehnel Corey R126ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

3. Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

4. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

5. Department of Critical Care, University of PittsburghSchool of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

6. Hebrew Senior Life, Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

BackgroundDonation after circulatory death (DCD) is becoming increasingly common, yet little is known about the way potential donors receive end-of-life care.PurposeThe aims of this systematic review are to describe the current practice in end-of-life care for potential donors and identify metrics that are being used to assess discomfort among these patients.Research design and Study SampleThis review encompasses published literature between June 1, 2000 and June 31, 2020 of end-of-life care received by potential DCD patients. The population of interest was defined as patients eligible for Maastracht classification III donation after circulatory death for a solid organ transplantation. Outcomes examined included: analgesic or palliative protocols, and surrogates of discomfort (eg dyspnea, agitation).ResultsAmong 141 unique articles, 27 studies were included for full review. The primary reason for exclusion was lack of protocol description, or lack of reporting on analgesic medications. No primary research studies specifically examined distress in the DCD eligible population. Numerous professional guidelines were identified. Surveys of critical care practitioners identified concerns regarding the impact of symptom management on hastening the dying process in the DCD population as a potential barrier to end-of-life palliative treatment.ConclusionsThere is a paucity of empirical evidence for end-of-life symptom assessment and management for DCD patients. Key evidence gaps identified for DCD include the need for: i) a multidisciplinary structure of treatment teams and preferred environment for DCD, ii) objective tools for monitoring of distress in this patient population, and iii) evidence guiding the administration of analgesic medications following withdrawal of life sustaining therapy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3