Affiliation:
1. Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, and Department of Philosophy and Moral Science
2. Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Ghent, Belgium
Abstract
A change in evaluation methodology, from a strictly technical approach to a more comprehensive one, would result in better and less biased decision making in connection with the introduction of information technology in health care. To reach this goal, guidelines are required for building and refining contextual frames, taking qualitative considerations into account. We used primary health care as an example. A literature search produced over 200 relevant articles, from which 76 were selected which explicitly referred to evaluation in connection with health-care information systems. Text analysis allowed us to classify them into three groups. This allowed the development of a contextual frame and emphasized the human dimension as a possible problem area when using medical information systems.
Reference26 articles.
1. Donaldson M, Yordy K, Vanselow N. Defining Primary Care: An Interim Report. Washington: Institute of Medicine, 1994:9.
2. How To Do Things With Words
3. Speech Acts
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献