Conceptualizing and Measuring Support for Democracy: A New Approach

Author:

Claassen Christopher1ORCID,Ackermann Kathrin2,Bertsou Eri3,Borba Lucas4,Carlin Ryan E.5ORCID,Cavari Amnon6,Dahlum Sirianne7ORCID,Gherghina Sergiu1,Hawkins Darren8,Lelkes Yphtach9,Magalhães Pedro C.10,Mattes Robert11,Meijers Maurits J.12,Neundorf Anja1ORCID,Oross Dániel13,Öztürk Aykut1,Sarsfield Rodolfo14,Self Darin8ORCID,Stanley Ben15ORCID,Tsai Tsung-han16ORCID,Zaslove Andrej12,Zechmeister Elizabeth J.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Glasgow, UK

2. University of Siegen, Germany

3. University of St Gallen, Switzerland

4. Vanderbilt University, USA

5. Georgia State University, USA

6. Reichman University, Israel

7. University of Oslo, Norway

8. Brigham Young University, USA

9. University of Pennsylvania, USA

10. Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal

11. Strathclyde University, UK

12. Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands

13. Centre for Social Sciences, Hungary

14. Autonomous University of Queretaro, Mexico, Fundación Carolina, Spain

15. SWPSUniversity, Poland

16. Academia Sinica, Taiwan

Abstract

Much of what we know about public support for democracy is based on survey questions about “democracy,” a term that varies in meaning across countries and likely prompts uncritically supportive responses. This paper proposes a new approach to measuring support for democracy. We develop a battery of 17 survey questions that cover all eight components of liberal democracy as defined by the V-Dem project. We then ask respondents from 19 national samples to evaluate these rights and institutions. We find considerable heterogeneity across countries in how our items cohere, especially in less developed contexts. Yet, those items that are more weakly connected with general support for liberal democracy tend to reveal the influence of political events and actors, arguably indicating weaknesses in political cultures. We further identify a concise subset of seven items that provide a reliable and valid measure of support for liberal democracy across our different samples.

Funder

Multiple funders; see acknowledgements on p.2

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Gender and support for undemocratic politicians;European Journal of Politics and Gender;2024-07-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3