Affiliation:
1. Washington University in St. Louis
Abstract
It has been argued that inclusive and decentralized selection procedures create greater incentives for parliamentarians to enhance their personal reputations. However, while the observable implications of this theory are at the level of individual members, the empirical data often brought to bear on this question to date have been collected at an aggregate level—the partisan bloc or legislative term. Despite some previously positive aggregate results, the author finds no discernible support for the connection between candidate selection procedures and vote-seeking behavior in Israel at the individual parliamentarian level. The author suggests an alternative theory—based on the stage of the legislative career—that explains both individual-level behavior and the aggregate-level trend.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Electoral Strategy under Open-List Proportional Representation
2. Reforming Candidate Selection Methods
3. Democratizing a Democratic Procedure: Myth or Reality?
4. Bowler, S., Farrell, D.M. & Katz, R.S. (1999). Party cohesion, party discipline and parliaments . In S. Bowler, D. M. Farrell, & R. S. Katz (Eds.), Party discipline and parliamentary government (pp. 3-22). Columbus : Ohio State University Press.
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献