Affiliation:
1. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Abstract
Political scientists largely agree that causal mechanisms are crucial to understanding causation. Recent advances in qualitative and quantitative methodology suggest that causal explanations must be contextually bounded. Yet the relationship between context and mechanisms and this relationship's importance for causation are not well understood. This study defines causal mechanisms as portable concepts that explain how and why a hypothesized cause, in a given context, contributes to a particular outcome. In turn, it defines context as the relevant aspects of a setting in which an array of initial conditions leads to an outcome of a defined scope and meaning via causal mechanisms. Drawing from these definitions is the argument that credible causal explanation can occur if and only if researchers are attentive to the interaction between causal mechanisms and context, regardless of whether the methods employed are small-sample, formal, statistical, or interpretive.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference63 articles.
1. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research
2. Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations
3. Boudon, Raymond. (1998). Social mechanisms without black boxes. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 172-203). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Critical Comparisons in Politics and Culture
Cited by
545 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献