Theory and practice in the context of health promotion program evaluation

Author:

Lobato Tavares Maria da Fátima1,Santos Barros Cláudia Márcia2,Baumgarten Marcondes Willer3,Bodstein Regina3,Cynamon Cohen Simone3,Cynamon Kligerman Debora3,Comarú Francisco4,Santos Silva Carlos5,Bógus Cláudia Maria4,da Rocha Rosa Maria3,Moraes de Mello Alexandre6,Adesse Leila7,Edmundo Katia8,Mendes Rosilda9

Affiliation:

1. Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil, flobato@ensp.fiocruz.br

2. Social Commerce Service (SESC) - National Department, Brasil

3. Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil

4. Faculty of Public Health, São Paolo University, Brazil

5. Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

6. School of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

7. Researcher, Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil

8. Center for Health Promotion (CEDAPS), Brazil

9. CEPEDOC Healthy Municipalities, Faculty of Public Health, São Paolo University, Brazil

Abstract

Evaluation of health promotion (HP) actions is a major challenge, generating inquiries and reflections that can contribute on the effectiveness of the actions themselves. With the aim on fostering exchange on monitoring and evaluation experiences related to the implementation of healthy settings, the 1st Brazilian Seminar on Health Promotion Effectiveness was launched in 2005. The program included round table and workshops known as Working Groups (WG) in Brazil. The criteria used to constitute the workshops focused settings as spaces of circulation and living as an intrinsic connection to lifestyles and conditions, as well as to social and/or environmental risk factors associated with groups living in these settings day after day. Focusing on evaluation as an activity that generates knowledge, this article highlights and stimulates the discussion about some major issues arising from the theoretical-methodological approach and the discussions developed in the workshops. The debates carried out during the Seminar illustrated the different perceptions and views of the social players involved in implementation and evaluation of HP practices, disclosing a multiplicity of meanings. It became clear that procedures are needed to document a future maturation of concepts and methods, in combination with further in-depth theoretical discussion. (Promotion & Education, 2007, Supplement (1): pp 27-30)

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Toward Best Practice in Evaluation;Health Promotion Practice;2015-02-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3