Extrapolation and AI transparency: Why machine learning models should reveal when they make decisions beyond their training

Author:

Cao Xuenan1ORCID,Yousefzadeh Roozbeh23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cultural and Religious Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

2. Yale Center for Medical Informatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

3. VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA

Abstract

The right to artificial intelligence (AI) explainability has consolidated as a consensus in the research community and policy-making. However, a key component of explainability has been missing: extrapolation, which can reveal whether a model is making inferences beyond the boundaries of its training. We report that AI models extrapolate outside their range of familiar data, frequently and without notifying the users and stakeholders. Knowing whether a model has extrapolated or not is a fundamental insight that should be included in explaining AI models in favor of transparency, accountability, and fairness. Instead of dwelling on the negatives, we offer ways to clear the roadblocks in promoting AI transparency. Our commentary accompanies practical clauses useful to include in AI regulations such as the AI Bill of Rights, the National AI Initiative Act in the United States, and the AI Act by the European Commission.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Communication,Information Systems

Reference18 articles.

1. Balestriero R, Pesenti J, LeCun Y (2021) Learning in high dimension always amounts to extrapolation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09485.

2. Barocas S, Hardt M, Narayanan A (2019) Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities. fairmlbook.org. http://www.fairmlbook.org.

3. Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off

4. “Explaining” machine learning reveals policy challenges

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3