Social impacts of algorithmic decision-making: A research agenda for the social sciences

Author:

Gerdon Frederic12ORCID,Bach Ruben L3ORCID,Kern Christoph3ORCID,Kreuter Frauke24ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

2. Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, München, Germany

3. School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

4. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

Abstract

Academic and public debates are increasingly concerned with the question whether and how algorithmic decision-making (ADM) may reinforce social inequality. Most previous research on this topic originates from computer science. The social sciences, however, have huge potentials to contribute to research on social consequences of ADM. Based on a process model of ADM systems, we demonstrate how social sciences may advance the literature on the impacts of ADM on social inequality by uncovering and mitigating biases in training data, by understanding data processing and analysis, as well as by studying social contexts of algorithms in practice. Furthermore, we show that fairness notions need to be evaluated with respect to specific outcomes of ADM systems and with respect to concrete social contexts. Social sciences may evaluate how individuals handle algorithmic decisions in practice and how single decisions aggregate to macro social outcomes. In this overview, we highlight how social sciences can apply their knowledge on social stratification and on substantive domains of ADM applications to advance the understanding of social impacts of ADM.

Funder

Baden-Württemberg Stiftung

Volkswagen Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Communication,Information Systems

Reference113 articles.

1. Subsidy Allocations in the Presence of Income Shocks

2. Simulation of the Governance of Complex Systems (SimCo): Basic Concepts and Experiments on Urban Transportation

3. Aghaei S, Azizi MJ, Vayanos P (2019)Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Making. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10598 (accessed 10 May 2021).

4. AlgorithmWatch (2019)Atlas of Automation. Automated Decision-Making and Participation in Germany. Available at: https://atlas.algorithmwatch.org/en (accessed 10 May 2021).

5. Allhutter D, Mager A, Cech F, et al. (2020)Der AMS Algorithmus. Eine Soziotechnische Analyse des Arbeitsmarktchancen-Assistenz-Systems (AMAS). Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1553/ITA-pb-2020-02 (accessed 18 February 2022).

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3