Big Tech platforms in health research: Re-purposing big data governance in light of the General Data Protection Regulation’s research exemption

Author:

Marelli Luca123ORCID,Testa Giuseppe345ORCID,Van Hoyweghen Ine16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Life Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

2. Department of Medical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

3. Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy

4. Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

5. Human Technopole, Milan, Italy

6. KU Leuven Institute for Single Cell Omics (LISCO), Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

The emergence of a global industry of digital health platforms operated by Big Tech corporations, and its growing entanglements with academic and pharmaceutical research networks, raise pressing questions on the capacity of current data governance models, regulatory and legal frameworks to safeguard the sustainability of the health research ecosystem. In this article, we direct our attention toward the challenges faced by the European General Data Protection Regulation in regulating the potentially disruptive engagement of Big Tech platforms in health research. The General Data Protection Regulation upholds a rather flexible regime for scientific research through a number of derogations to otherwise stricter data protection requirements, while providing a very broad interpretation of the notion of “scientific research”. Precisely the breadth of these exemptions combined with the ample scope of this notion could provide unintended leeway to the health data processing activities of Big Tech platforms, which have not been immune from carrying out privacy-infringing and socially disruptive practices in the health domain. We thus discuss further finer-grained demarcations to be traced within the broadly construed notion of scientific research, geared to implementing use-based data governance frameworks that distinguish health research activities that should benefit from a facilitated data protection regime from those that should not. We conclude that a “re-purposing” of big data governance approaches in health research is needed if European nations are to promote research activities within a framework of high safeguards for both individual citizens and society.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Communication,Information Systems

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Digital Economy Based on Neural Networks on Corporate Governance Model;Journal of the Knowledge Economy;2024-08-27

2. Features of the Interface of System for Solving Social Problems;2024 8th International Conference on Computer, Software and Modeling (ICCSM);2024-07-04

3. Sphere transgressions in medical research: tactical engagements with Apple’s ResearchKit;Information, Communication & Society;2024-04-15

4. A Clustering Algorithm for Health Care Big Data Governance System;2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Data Science and Computer Application (ICDSCA);2023-10-27

5. Conceptualizing fairness in the secondary use of health data for research: A scoping review;Accountability in Research;2023-10-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3