Self-Assessment Survey: Evaluation of a Revised Measure Assessing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

Author:

Kittelman Angus12ORCID,Izzard Sara1,McIntosh Kent1ORCID,Morris Kelsey R.2,Lewis Timothy J.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Oregon, Eugene, USA

2. University of Missouri, Columbia, USA

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) 4.0, an updated measure assessing implementation fidelity of positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS). A total of 627 school personnel from 33 schools in six U.S. states completed the SAS 4.0 during the 2021–2022 school year. We evaluated data demonstrating the measure’s reliability (internal consistency, interrater reliability between PBIS team and non-team members), internal structure, and convergent validity for assessing implementation of Tier 1, 2, and 3 systems. We found strong internal consistency (overall and across subscales) and evidence regarding the internal structure as a four-factor measure. In addition, we found the SAS 4.0 (overall score and subscales) to be statistically significantly correlated with another widely used and empirically evaluated PBIS fidelity measure, the Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI). We found a statistically significant correlation between the SAS 4.0 and the SAS 3.0 for the Schoolwide Systems subscale but not other subscales. We discuss limitations given the current sample and describe implications for how PBIS teams can use the measure for school improvement and decision making.

Funder

institute of education sciences

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference15 articles.

1. Algozzine R. F., Barrett S., Eber L., George H., Horner R. H., Lewis T. J., Putnam R. F., Swain-Bradway J., McIntosh K., Sugai G. (2014). SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. https://www.pbis.org

2. Sampling Weights in Latent Variable Modeling

3. Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2021). Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) version 4.0. University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org

4. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3