Psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care in the United Kingdom: A scoping review of primary research

Author:

Olive Philippa1ORCID,Hives Lucy2,Wilson Neil2,Ashton Amy3,O’Brien Marie Claire4,Mercer Gemma5,Jassat Raeesa6,Harris Catherine7

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

2. Research Facilitation and Delivery Unit, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

3. Clinical Health Psychology Service, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK

4. Neuropsychology Department, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

5. Acute Rehabilitation Trauma Unit, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

6. School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

7. Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

Abstract

Introduction More people are surviving major trauma, often with life changing injuries. Alongside physical injury, many survivors of major trauma experience psychological and psychosocial impacts. Presently, there is little guidance at the UK national level for psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care. Set in the context of the regional model of major trauma care implemented in the UK in 2012, the purpose of this review was to identify and bring together primary research about psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care in the UK to produce an overview of the field to date, identify knowledge gaps and set research priorities. Methods A scoping review was undertaken. Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, SocINDEX with Full Text and PROSPERO) were searched alongside a targeted grey literature search. Data from included studies were extracted using a predefined extraction form and underwent bibliometric analysis. Included studies were then grouped by type of research, summarised, and synthesised to produce a descriptive summary and overview of the field. Results The searches identified 5,975 articles. Following screening, 43 primary research studies were included in the scoping review. The scoping review, along with previous research, illustrates that psychological and psychosocial impacts are to be expected following major trauma. However, it also found that these aspects of care are commonly underserved and that there are inherent inequities across major trauma care pathways in the UK. Conclusion Though the scoping review identified a growing body of research investigating psychological and psychosocial aspects of major trauma care pathways in the UK, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Research is needed to establish clinically effective psychological and psychosocial assessment tools, corresponding interventions, and patient-centred outcome measures so that survivors of major trauma (and family members or carers) receive the most appropriate care and intervention.

Funder

UCLan Institute for Global Health and Wellbeing

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine,Surgery

Reference74 articles.

1. Defining major trauma: a pre-hospital perspective using focus groups

2. NHS Clinical Advisory Group on Trauma. Regional Networks for Major Trauma. NHS Clinical Advisory Group on Trauma, pp. 1–137. Regional networks for major trauma - NHS Clinical Advisory Groups report, Sept2010 (uhs.nhs.uk) (2010, accessed 17 January 22).

3. Findlay G, Martin IC, Carter S, et al. Trauma: who cares? national confidential enquiry into trauma patient outcome and death p. 1–151. NCEPOD - Trauma: Who Cares? Report (2007), (2007, accessed 17 January 2022).

4. Changing the System - Major Trauma Patients and Their Outcomes in the NHS (England) 2008–17

5. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3