Reliability of open globe injury repair surgical videos on the internet for resident education

Abstract

Introduction This study aimed to assess quality of surgical training videos for management of open globe injury (OGI) on online platforms. Material and Methods Twenty-three websites with surgical training videos were queried using the search keyword “open globe repair.” Video content characteristics and quality assessment scores using Sandvik score, Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HON code), mDISCERN scoring, and global quality score (GQS) were recorded. To evaluate the relevance of the surgical videos to the surgical procedure, steps were analyzed as per the Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (OSCAR) for Open Globe Surgical Management. Results One hundred and twenty-three videos were evaluated, and 63 analyzed. Majority videos were uploaded by solitary ophthalmologists (53/63; 84.13%). Mean video quality score (VQS) and GIS scores were 6.55 ± 1.59 and 7.95 ± 1.39, respectively. Mean mDISCERN, GQS, HON Code and Sandvik scores for all the videos were 2.87 ± 1.07, 3.77 ± 1.08, 5.14 ± 1.67, 12.06 ± 1.84, respectively. Videos with background audio and descriptive subtitles had significantly better quality ( p < 0.05). All Quality assessment scores showed a statistically significant ( p < 0.000) positive correlation with each other. On linear regression analysis, number of video likes, comments and views had a significant ( p < 0.05) positive relation with quality of video, whereas video length showed a negative relation with different scores. Conclusion Nearly two-thirds of surgical videos showing OGI repair had good quality assessment scores. Consensus guidelines should be developed to guide uploaders as regards the essential features required for good quality surgical videos using a standardized rubric.