Beliefs Among Professionals About Rates of False Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse

Author:

EVERSON MARK D.1,BOAT BARBARA W.1,BOURG SHERRIE1,ROBERTSON KEVIN R.1

Affiliation:

1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Abstract

A total of 244 judges, law enforcement officers, mental health practitioners, and child protection service (CPS) workers were surveyed to explore their beliefs about the frequency with which children lie or fail to tell the truth when they allege sexual abuse. Results indicated that judges and law enforcement officers were significantly more skeptical of children's reports than were mental health and CPS workers. Although age, gender, and years of experience did not appear to affect beliefs about credibility, those professionals who dealt with more cases of child sexual abuse in the previous year were significantly more likely to believe the reports of children than were professionals who worked with fewer cases. Significant differences also were found among professional groups on whether children never or frequently lie about sexual abuse. Finally, across all groups, reports of sexual abuse made by female adolescents were viewed as significantly less believable than other groups of children. The implications of these findings for professionals are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. 93 Emotional eyewitnesses and forensic questioning;Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science [HSK] 46/3;2023-04-24

2. Blaming Children: How Rape Myths Manifest in Defense Attorneys’ Questions to Children Testifying About Child Sexual Abuse;Journal of Interpersonal Violence;2021-06-16

3. Professionals’ Attitude Toward Reporting Child Sexual Abuse in Saudi Arabia;Journal of Child Sexual Abuse;2017-09-14

4. To prosecute or not to prosecute: Law students' judicial decisions in CSA cases;Scandinavian Journal of Psychology;2015-12-16

5. Evaluating Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse in Custody Disputes;Handbook of Child Custody;2015-08-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3