Premaxillary Setback in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Repair

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate surgical outcomes and maxillofacial growth in patients undergoing primary lip repair with or without premaxillary setback. Design Retrospective review. Setting Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, California. Patients and Participants Patients with bilateral cleft lip  ±  palate (BCLP) who underwent lip repair with or without premaxillary setback from January 1975 to September 2021. Interventions No intervention was performed. Main Outcome Measure(s) Patient demographics, comorbidities, and syndromic status were obtained. Indications for premaxillary setback, incidence of midface hypoplasia, orthodontic and/or orthognathic treatments, follow-up, complications, and revisions were recorded and analyzed. Comparisons among long-term outcomes, particularly the development of midface hypoplasia were made between groups. Results Thirty-one patients who underwent BCLP repair with premaxillary setback (BCLP  +  PS) and 31 matched control patients who underwent BCLP repair without premaxillary setback (BCLP − PS) were included. Among the 2 groups, multiple logistic regression demonstrated that when controlling for comorbidities, syndromic status, timing of lip repair, and timing of palate repair, premaxillary setback was neither significantly associated with the development of midface hypoplasia ( P  =  .076) nor the timing of midface hypoplasia development ( P  =  .940) in those that ultimately acquired this facial dysmorphology. Conclusions While a high incidence of midface hypoplasia was seen in both BCLP  ±  PS and BCLP − PS, our findings demonstrate no difference in midface hypoplasia irrespective of premaxillary setback in the setting of BCLP. Future prospective studies investigating the downstream ramifications of our suggested selection criteria for premaxillary setback are warranted.