A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing APD and CAPD Treatment

Author:

Bro Susanne1,Bjorner Jakob B.2,Tofte–Jensen Pernille1,Klem Susanne1,Almtoft Birte3,Danielsen Henning3,Meincke Margot4,Friedberg Michael4,Feldt–Rasmussen Bo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nephrology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen

2. Department of Health Services Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen

3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Viborg County Hospital, Viborg

4. Department of Nephrology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

Abstract

Objective The goals for maintenance dialysis treatment are to improve patient survival, reduce patient morbidity, and improve patient quality of life. This is the first randomized prospective study comparing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) treatment with respect to quality of life and clinical outcomes in relation to therapy costs. Design A prospective, randomized multicenter study. Setting Three Danish CAPD units. Patients Thirty-four adequately dialyzed patients with high or high-average peritoneal transport characteristics were included in the study. Twenty-five patients completed the study. Interventions After randomization, 17 patients were allocated to APD treatment and 17 patients to CAPD treatment for a period of 6 months. Medical and biochemical parameters were evaluated at monthly controls in the CAPD units. Quality-of-life parameters were assessed at baseline and after 6 months by the self-administered short-form SF-36 generic health survey questionnaire supplemented with disease- and treatment-specific questions. Therapy costs were compared by evaluating dialysis-related expenses. Main Outcome Measures Quality-of-life parameters, dialysis-related complications, dialysis-related expenses. Results The quality-of-life studies showed that significantly more time for work, family, and social activities was available to patients on APD compared to those on CAPD ( p < 0.001). Although the difference was not significant, there was a tendency for less physical and emotional discomfort caused by dialysis fluid in the APD group. Sleep problems, on the other hand, tended to be more marked in the APD group. Any positive effect of APD compared to CAPD on dialysis-related hospital days or complication rates could not be confirmed. With larger patient samples, it is possible, however, that a significant difference might have been achieved. The running costs for APD treatment were US $75 per day and for CAPD treatment US $61 per day. Conclusion If APD treatment can help to keep selected patients vocationally or socially active, paying the extra cost seems reasonable.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,General Medicine

Cited by 117 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3