Icodextrin Improves Metabolic and Fluid Management in High and High-Average Transport Diabetic Patients

Author:

Paniagua Ramón1,Ventura María-de-Jesús1,Ávila-Díaz Marcela1,Cisneros Alejandra2,Vicenté–Martínez Marlén3,Furlong María-del-Carmen4,García-González Zuzel5,Villanueva Diana5,Orihuela Oscar1,Prado-Uribe María-del-Carmen1,Alcántara Guadalupe1,Amato Dante1

Affiliation:

1. Unidad de Investigatión Médica en Enfermedades Nefrológicas, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI;

2. Hospital General de Zona 27, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México

3. Hospital General de Zona 47, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México

4. Hospital General de Zona 8, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México

5. Hospital General de Zona 25, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México

Abstract

Background Icodextrin-based solutions (ICO) have clinical and theoretical advantages over glucose-based solutions (GLU) in fluid and metabolic management of diabetic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients; however, these advantages have not yet been tested in a randomized fashion. Objective To analyze the effects of ICO on metabolic and fluid control in high and high-average transport diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD). Patients and Methods A 12-month, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare ICO ( n = 30) versus GLU ( n = 29) in diabetic CAPD patients with high-average and high peritoneal transport characteristics. The basic daily schedule was 3 × 2 L GLU (1.5%) and either 1 × 2 L ICO (7.5%) or 1 × 2 L GLU (2.5%) for the long-dwell exchange, with substitution of 2.5% or 4.25% for 1.5% GLU being allowed when clinically necessary. Variables related to metabolic and fluid control were measured each month. Results Groups were similar at baseline in all measured variables. More than 66% of the patients using GLU, but only 9% using ICO, needed prescriptions of higher glucose concentration solutions. Ultrafiltration (UF) was higher (198 ± 101 mL/day, p < 0.05) in the ICO group than in the GLU group over time. Changes from baseline were more pronounced in the ICO group than in the GLU group for extracellular fluid volume (0.23 ± 1.38 vs –1.0 ± 1.48 L, p < 0.01) and blood pressure (systolic 1.5 ± 24.0 vs –10.4 ± 30.0 mmHg, p < 0.01; diastolic 1.5 ± 13.5 vs –6.2 ± 14.2 mmHg, p < 0.01). Compared to baseline, patients in the ICO group had better metabolic control than those in the GLU group: glucose absorption was more reduced (–17 ± 44 vs –64 ± 35 g/day) as were insulin needs (3.6 ± 3.4 vs – 9.1 ± 4.7 U/day, p < 0.01), fasting serum glucose (8.3 ± 36.5 vs –37 ± 25.8 mg/dL, p < 0.01), triglycerides (54.5 ± 31.9 vs –54.7 ± 39.9 mg/dL, p < 0.01), and glycated hemoglobin (0.79% ± 0.79% vs –0.98% ± 0.51%, p < 0.01). Patients in the ICO group had fewer adverse events related to fluid and glucose control than patients in the GLU group. Conclusion Icodextrin represents a significant advantage in the management of high transport diabetic patients on PD, improving peritoneal UF and fluid control and reducing the burden of glucose overexposure, thereby facilitating metabolic control.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,General Medicine

Cited by 116 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3