Comparison between the ‘pull technique’ and open surgery for peritoneal catheter removal in Chinese patients on peritoneal dialysis

Author:

Dai Yunxin1,Guo Hancheng1ORCID,Li Tingmin1,Yao Chunmeng1,Xie Zugang2,Wang Fuzhen3,Yao Cuiwei4,Guan Tianjun1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Fujian, China

2. Department of Nephrology, Longyan People’s Hospital, Fujian, China

3. Department of Nephrology, First Hospital of Longyan, Fujian, China

4. Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China

Abstract

Background: The removal techniques for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters are open surgical dissection (OD) and the ‘pull technique’ (PT). The latter is limitedly used because of uncertainty about its feasibility and safety. This study aimed to compare the outcomes and complications between the two techniques. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent PD catheter removal from January 2015 to January 2021 in four PD centres in China. The patients were grouped according to the different removal techniques and were followed up to observe the potential complications. Results: The demographic characteristics of patients in the PT ( n = 68) and OD ( n = 44) groups showed no significant difference. The indications for PD catheter removal were similar between the two groups, except for a higher frequency of peritonitis in the OD group ( p = 0.010). In the PT group, the main complications were broken catheter (7.4%), superficial cuff infection (4.8%) and subcutaneous bleeding (4.8%). In the OD group, the main complications were death (9.1%) and subcutaneous bleeding (4.6%). Conclusion: PT might be a safe and reliable technique for PD catheter removal compared to OD. Considering its simple and non-invasive nature, PT should be recommended as the alternative to OD in suitable PD patients.

Funder

the Foundation for Key Discipline of Fujian Province, China, 2018

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3