Affiliation:
1. University of Michigan Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Health Policy, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
Abstract
Objective To discuss potential reasons for reported differences in the results of several recent studies comparing mortality risk among continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis patients, and to assess the role of statistical methods and study design. Data Sources Recent published reports comparing mortality risk among patients treated with CAPD and hemodialysis. Conclusions Differences in study design, study populations, sample size, data collection, and availability of data likely account in part for the differences in available study results. The Cox model is a valuable tool, particularly for observational studies. Observed outcome differences for CAPD and hemodialysis patients may be due to either the dialytic modality itself or other factors such as differences in patient selection, practice patterns, dialysis dose, patient compliance, etc. Relative mortality rates for hemodialysis and CAPD patients may vary by country, as these factors may differ internationally. A randomized clinical trial is necessary to best determine the effect of the modality itself.
Subject
Nephrology,General Medicine
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献