Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Market-based Instruments and Trade Policies for Environmental Goods: Evidence from Malaysia

Author:

Paramasua Muralitharan1,Devadason Evelyn S.2ORCID,Tehrani Pardis Moslemzadeh3

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

2. Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

3. Faculty of Law, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

This article investigates policy constraints for the environmental goods sector in Malaysia based on the dimensions of market-based (including regulatory) instruments and trade policies. In-depth structured interviews with the government and key industry players are conducted, and six overarching themes constraining the efficacy of the instruments and policies were identified. The findings suggest that incentives and loans for this sector are skewed to manufacturers and low-risk projects, respectively. The major policy gaps in this sector are mostly related to procedural issues, namely non-transparent information, non-uniformity of requirements and complex documentation for certification, licensing and permits.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Development,Cultural Studies

Reference70 articles.

1. An Overview of Key Markets, Tariffs and Non-tariff Measures on Asian Exports of Select Environmental Goods

2. Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). (2011). APEC leaders’ declaration—Trade and investment in environmental goods and services (Leaders Statement). https://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations?SelectedYear=2011&Page=1

3. Removing barriers to trade on environmental goods: an appraisal

4. Baria L., Cattafesta C. & Garrido R. (2004). Environmental goods and services: Challenges and opportunities for central American and Caribbean countries. https://p166.unctad.org/file.php/54/29feb2008/docs/EnvGoodsAndServicesChallengesAndOppforCentral.pdf

5. Do Technical Barriers to Trade Promote or Restrict Trade? Evidence from China

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3