Barriers and facilitators to participation in a health check for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: A systematic review

Author:

de Waard Anne-Karien M1,Wändell Per E2,Holzmann Martin J34,Korevaar Joke C5,Hollander Monika1,Gornitzki Carl6,de Wit Niek J1,Schellevis François G57,Lionis Christos8,Søndergaard Jens9,Seifert Bohumil10,Carlsson Axel C211

Affiliation:

1. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, the Netherlands

2. Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden

3. Functional Area of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

5. NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), the Netherlands

6. University Library, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden

7. Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Center, the Netherlands

8. Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, University of Crete, Greece

9. Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

10. Department of General Practice, Charles University, Czech Republic

11. Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden

Abstract

Background Health checks for cardiometabolic diseases could play a role in the identification of persons at high risk for disease. To improve the uptake of these health checks in primary care, we need to know what barriers and facilitators determine participation. Methods We used an iterative search strategy consisting of three steps: (a) identification of key-articles; (b) systematic literature search in PubMed, Medline and Embase based on keywords; (c) screening of titles and abstracts and subsequently full-text screening. We summarised the results into four categories: characteristics, attitudes, practical reasons and healthcare provider-related factors. Results Thirty-nine studies were included. Attitudes such as wanting to know of cardiometabolic disease risk, feeling responsible for, and concerns about one’s own health were facilitators for participation. Younger age, smoking, low education and attitudes such as not wanting to be, or being, worried about the outcome, low perceived severity or susceptibility, and negative attitude towards health checks or prevention in general were barriers. Furthermore, practical issues such as information and the ease of access to appointments could influence participation. Conclusion Barriers and facilitators to participation in health checks for cardiometabolic diseases were heterogeneous. Hence, it is not possible to develop a ‘one size fits all’ approach to maximise the uptake. For optimal implementation we suggest a multifactorial approach adapted to the national context with special attention to people who might be more difficult to reach. Increasing the uptake of health checks could contribute to identifying the people at risk to be able to start preventive interventions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3