Partner engagement for planning and development of non-pharmacological care pathways in the AIM-Back trial

Author:

Ballengee Lindsay A12ORCID,King Heather A134,Simon Corey2,Lentz Trevor A25,Allen Kelli D16,Stanwyck Catherine1,Gladney Micaela1,George Steven Z125,Hastings S Nicole1347

Affiliation:

1. Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

3. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

4. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

5. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

6. Department of Medicine and Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

7. Center for the Study of Aging, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

Abstract

Background/Aims Embedded pragmatic clinical trials are increasingly recommended for non-pharmacological pain care research due to their focus on examining intervention effectiveness within real-world settings. Engagement with patients, health care providers, and other partners is essential, yet there is limited guidance for how to use engagement to meaningfully inform the design of interventions to be tested in pain-related pragmatic clinical trials. This manuscript aims to describe the process and impacts of partner input on the design of two interventions (care pathways) for low back pain currently being tested in an embedded pragmatic trial in the Veterans Affairs health care system. Methods Sequential cohort design for intervention development was followed. Engagement activities were conducted with 25 participants between November 2017 and June 2018. Participants included representatives from multiple groups: clinicians, administrative leadership, patients, and caregivers. Results Partner feedback led to several changes in each of the care pathways to improve patient experience and usability. Major changes to the sequenced care pathway included transitioning from telephone-based delivery to a flexible telehealth model, increased specificity about pain modulation activities, and reduction of physical therapy visits. Major changes to the pain navigator pathway included transitioning from a traditional stepped care model to one that offers care in a feedback loop, increased flexibility regarding pain navigator provider type, and increased specificity for patient discharge criteria. Centering patient experience emerged as a key consideration from all partner groups. Conclusion Diverse input is important to consider before implementing new interventions in embedded pragmatic trials. Partner engagement can increase acceptability of new care pathways to patients and providers and enhance uptake of effective interventions by health systems. Trial registration NCT#04411420. Registered on 2 June 2020.

Funder

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation

Department of Veteran’s Affairs Quality Scholars Fellowship

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3