Using causal models to show the effect of untestable assumptions on effect estimates in randomized controlled trials

Author:

Allard Robert1,Boivin Jean-François2

Affiliation:

1. Regional Health Agency, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Joint Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,

2. Joint Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

Background The methods by which randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are analyzed rest on several assumptions, most of which are untestable. Purpose To show how estimates of the net effect of treatment on survival can be obtained requiring only the assumption that randomization produced equivalent groups. Methods The assumptions underlying ratio measures of effect, based on disease occurrence times (DOT) obtained from survival curves, are identified and cumulatively removed. Results The four assumptions usually made are that (1) the ratio of disease incidence rates under treatment and under reference exposure is constant over time, (2) the groups being compared are exchangeable (equivalent), (3) a subject's DOT under treatment is independent of what his DOT would have been under the reference exposure, and (4) the treatment effect, if any, is in the same direction in all subjects. Removing Assumption 4 leads to an estimator of effect resembling the etiologic fraction, but able to accommodate both causative and preventive effects. Removing all assumptions but that of exchangeability still permits the estimation, directly from the survival curves, of a range of effect magnitudes, causative or preventive, compatible with the observed DOTs. The exchangeability assumption is the easiest to meet, by randomizing enough subjects. Limitations The statistical uncertainty that affects the estimates of survival probabilities has been ignored. Taking uncertainty into account further widens the range of effects compatible with the observations. Conclusions Retaining only the exchangeability assumption allows for a range of possible treatment effects to be estimated, although it may be wide. Readers of RCT reports should understand that the determination of a point estimate of effect within this range is entirely a function of unverifiable analytic assumptions. Clinical Trials 2007; 4: 611—620. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Bibliography;Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics;2010-08-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3