Nonparametric estimator of relative time with application to the Acyclovir Prevention Trial

Author:

Cole Stephen R1,Haitao Chu 2,Lei Nie 3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, UNC at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA,

2. Department of Biostatistics, UNC at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

3. Office of Biometrics, CDER/OTS/FDA, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA

Abstract

Background Relative hazard is a central measure of association in randomized clinical trials. Relative time (RT) is a competing measure that is rarely used. PurposeWe describe a simple area-based nonparametric estimator of RT and illustrate its use in the Acyclovir Prevention Trial. Methods Let Q x(p) be the quantile function for the xth treatment group, defined as the time by which p% of the treatment group experience the event, and p x be the maximum event proportion observed. Our consistent estimator is defined as the ratio of the integrals of Q1(p) and Q0 (p) with integration over 0 to p, where p =min(p1, p 0). Confidence limits (CL) are provided by bootstrap. Results A total of 703 immunocompetent adult men and women (54% male, 79% Caucasian, median age 49 years) with a history of ocular herpes simplex virus (HSV) were enrolled in 1992—1996, randomized to acyclovir or placebo, followed for up to 1 year for the 1st episode of ocular HSV, and 170 events were confirmed by a study-certified ophthalmologist using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The nonparametric RT comparing acyclovir use with nonuse was 2.6 (bootstrap 95% CL: 1.6, 4.2). For comparison, the best-fitting parametric model was the lognormal (RT = 2.5; 95% CL: 1.5, 3.9). In limited simulations, the average proposed estimate of RT was similar to the true RT with a relative root mean squared error of 1.13 compared to a correctly specified parametric (lognormal) model. Limitations An analytical variance estimator for the proposed RT is lacking. Also, more examples and more extensive simulations are warranted. Conclusions Similar to Cox’s relative hazard estimator, the proposed RT does not assume the data are generated from a particular distribution. RTs should be more widely used as a measure of association in clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2009; 6: 320—328. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3