Adolescent knowledge and attitudes related to clinical trials

Author:

Brown Devin L1,Cowdery Joan E2,Jones Toni Stokes3,Langford Aisha45,Gammage Catherine6,Jacobs Teresa L17

Affiliation:

1. Stroke Program, The Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. School of Health Promotion & Human Performance, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA

3. Department of Teacher Education, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA

4. Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA

5. Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

6. Science Department, Melvindale High School, Melvindale, MI, USA

7. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Abstract

Background or aims Poor enrollment plagues most clinical trials. Furthermore, despite mandates to improve minority representation in clinical trial participation, little progress has been made. We investigated the knowledge and attitudes of adolescents related to clinical trials and made race/ethnicity comparisons in an attempt to identify a possible educational intervention target. Methods Students aged 13–18 years in southeast Michigan were offered participation through a class at one high school or two academic summer enrichment programs that drew from multiple high schools (73% response). Questionnaires previously validated in adults were administered. Non-Hispanic whites were compared with minorities using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results Of the 82 respondents, the median age was 16 years (interquartile range: 15–17 years); 22 (28%) were white, 41 (51%) were African American, 11 (14%) were multiracial, 2 (2%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 1 (1%) was Asian, 3 (4%) were Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and 2 respondents did not report a race (but did report Hispanic ethnicity). Nine (12%) were Hispanic. Only 27 (33%) had ever heard of a clinical trial. On a scale from 1 (most receptive) to 5 (least receptive) for learning more about a clinical trial for a relevant medical condition, the median score was 2 (interquartile range: 1–3) and for participating in a clinical trial for a relevant medical condition was 2 (interquartile range: 2–3). Overall knowledge was poor, with a median of 46% (interquartile range: 23%−62%) of knowledge answers correct. Knowledge was reduced (p = 0.0006) and attitudes were more negative (p = 0.05) in minorities than non-Hispanic whites, while minorities also endorsed more substantial barriers to trial participation (p = 0.0002). Distrust was similar between minority students and non-Hispanic whites (p = 0.15), and self-efficacy was greater in non-Hispanic whites (p = 0.05). Conclusion Educational interventions directed toward adolescents that address knowledge, attitudes, and distrust in order to improve clinical trial awareness and receptivity overall are needed and may represent a tool to address disparities in minority enrollment in clinical trials.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3