Risk analysis and risk adapted on-site monitoring in noncommercial clinical trials

Author:

Brosteanu Oana1,Houben Peggy2,Ihrig Kristina3,Ohmann Christian4,Paulus Ursula5,Pfistner Beate6,Schwarz Gabriele7,Strenge-Hesse Anke8,Zettelmeyer Ulrike5

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany,

2. Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

3. Competence Network on Acute and Chronic Leukaemias, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

4. Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

5. Clinical Trial Centre Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Cologne

6. Clinical Trial Centre Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Cologne, Institute for Applied Mathematics, Friedrich-Wilhelms-University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

7. Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany

8. Competence Network Malignant Lymphomas, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, Network of Coordinating Centres for Clinical Trials (KKS Network), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Abstract

Background The concept of risk assessment for clinical trials has been discussed before, but no comprehensive structured procedure leading to risk-adapted quality management has been published so far. Such a procedure is of particular interest for noncommercial trials in order to optimally use the sparse resources. Purpose To provide a structured procedure for risk analysis in clinical trials. To propose strategies for on-site monitoring adapted to the risks identified. Results The risk analysis refers to the risk of noncompliance with the main objectives of Good Clinical Practice. It takes into account risks of the study intervention compared to the risks a patient would run if treated outside a protocol as well as further potential risks regarding patient safety, patient rights, or the credibility of results. The risk analysis is based on detailed questionnaires, which are used to draw up (a) an on-site monitoring strategy recommendation, (b) a list of trial-specific tasks to be covered by on-site monitoring, and (c) a specification of further quality management measures e.g., central monitoring measures. The resulting risk-adapted monitoring strategies focus on the trial’s critical aspects, and differ in terms of the recommended extent of on-site activities. Limitations The effectiveness of the proposed risk analysis and risk-adapted monitoring has not yet been confirmed. However, the ADAMON project (prospective cluster-randomised study of trial-specific adapted strategies for on-site monitoring in combination with additional quality management measures) has been started in Germany to investigate whether a trial-specific, risk-adapted, reduced on-site monitoring strategy is as effective as an intensive monitoring strategy with regard to the occurrence of serious or critical audit findings. Twelve clinical trials planning to recruit more than 3200 patients participate in this investigation. Conclusions Our proposal will provide sponsor-investigators and other noncommercial sponsors with an instrument that may facilitate risk analysis and the implementation of targeted quality management measures. Clinical Trials 2009; 6: 585—596. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3