Cost-benefit of outcome adjudication in nine randomised stroke trials

Author:

Godolphin Peter J12ORCID,Bath Philip M3,Algra Ale45,Berge Eivind6,Chalmers John7,Eliasziw Misha8,Hankey Graeme J9,Hosomi Naohisa10,Ranta Annamarei11,Weimar Christian12,Woodhouse Lisa J3,Montgomery Alan A1

Affiliation:

1. Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

2. MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, UK

3. Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

4. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

5. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

7. The George Institute for Global Health, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia

8. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA

9. Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

10. Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Therapeutics, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan

11. University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand

12. Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Neurologie, Hufelandstr, Essen, Germany

Abstract

Background Central adjudication of outcomes is common for randomised trials and should control for differential misclassification. However, few studies have estimated the cost of the adjudication process. Methods We estimated the cost of adjudicating the primary outcome in nine randomised stroke trials (25,436 participants). The costs included adjudicators’ time, direct payments to adjudicators, and co-ordinating centre costs (e.g. uploading cranial scans and general set-up costs). The number of events corrected after adjudication was our measure of benefit. We calculated cost per corrected event for each trial and in total. Results The primary outcome in all nine trials was either stroke or a composite that included stroke. In total, the adjudication process associated with this primary outcome cost in excess of £100,000 for a third of the trials (3/9). Mean cost per event corrected by adjudication was £2295.10 (SD: £1482.42). Conclusions Central adjudication is a time-consuming and potentially costly process. These costs need to be considered when designing a trial and should be evaluated alongside the potential benefits adjudication brings to determine whether they outweigh this expense.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3