Maintaining data integrity in a rural clinical trial

Author:

Van den Broeck Jan1,Mackay Melanie2,Mpontshane Nontobeko3,Kany Kany Luabeya Angelique3,Chhagan Meera4,Bennish Michael L.5

Affiliation:

1. Epidemiology Research Unit, Tropical Medicine Research Institute, University of The West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica,

2. Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu Natal, Somkhele, South Africa, Department of Microbiology, Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

3. Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu Natal, Somkhele, South Africa

4. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, United States, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

5. South Africa Medical Research Council, Mpilonhle, Mtubatuba, South Africa

Abstract

Background Clinical trials conducted in rural resource-poor settings face special challenges in ensuring quality of data collection and handling. The variable nature of these challenges, ways to overcome them, and the resulting data quality are rarely reported in the literature. Purpose To provide a detailed example of establishing local data handling capacity for a clinical trial conducted in a rural area, highlight challenges and solutions in establishing such capacity, and to report the data quality obtained by the trial. Methods We provide a descriptive case study of a data system for biological samples and questionnaire data, and the problems encountered during its implementation. To determine the quality of data we analyzed test—retest studies using Kappa statistics of inter- and intra-observer agreement on categorical data. We calculated Technical Errors of Measurement of anthropometric measurements, audit trail analysis was done to assess error correction rates, and residual error rates were calculated by database-to-source document comparison. Results Initial difficulties included the unavailability of experienced research nurses, programmers and data managers in this rural area and the difficulty of designing new software tools and a complex database while making them error-free. National and international collaboration and external monitoring helped ensure good data handling and implementation of good clinical practice. Data collection, fieldwork supervision and query handling depended on streamlined transport over large distances. The involvement of a community advisory board was helpful in addressing cultural issues and establishing community acceptability of data collection methods. Data accessibility for safety monitoring required special attention. Kappa values and Technical Errors of Measurement showed acceptable values. Residual error rates in key variables were low. Limitations The article describes the experience of a single-site trial and does not address challenges particular to multi-site trials. Conclusions Obtaining and maintaining data integrity in rural clinical trials is feasible, can result in acceptable data quality and can be used to develop capacity in developing country sites. It does, however, involve special challenges and requirements. Clinical Trials 2007; 4: 572—582. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3