Bayesian model averaging in meta-analysis: vitamin E supplementation and mortality

Abstract

Context The strength and relevance of a meta-analysis depends on the validity of the statistical methods used. Of special importance is appropriately assessing different sources of variability. Many studies including meta-analyses have evaluated the efficacy and safety of vitamin E and have yielded varying results. Illuminating and resolving these disparities requires addressing study variability and model uncertainty. Objective To describe Bayesian meta-analysis methods for combining data from clinical trials, using recent studies that analyzed the relationship between vitamin E dose and all-cause mortality. Data Sources Studies used in a previously published meta-analysis appended by studies identified by a search of MEDLINE from August 2004 to December 2005 using the MeSH terms vitamin e and alpha tocopherol. Study Selection Inclusion criteria: men and nonpregnant women; use of vitamin E alone or in combination with other vitamins or minerals; random allocation of participants to either vitamin E or a placebo or other control group; intervention and follow-up duration greater than 1 year; 10 or more deaths. Data Extraction Independent data extraction by one author was reviewed and confirmed by a second author. Corresponding authors of the original publications were contacted when questions arose. Data Synthesis Data collection included the number of patients and deaths, percent men, use of other vitamins or minerals, mean age, and length of follow-up. We combined study results using Bayesian hierarchical model averaging. Analyses used Markov chain Monte Carlo computational techniques. Conclusions Vitamin E intake is unlikely to affect mortality regardless of dose. The Bayesian meta-analyses presented here are ideal for incorporating disparate sources of variability, including trial effect and model uncertainty. Clinical Trials 2009; 6: 28—41. http://ctj.sagepub.com