Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium

Author:

Perdue Letitia H1,Albret Lotte2,Aldrich Alan3,Loth Amanda4,Sides Elizabeth G5,Dove Angela6,Wägner Ana M7,Waterman Rebecca4,Pierce June J5,Akolkar Beena8,Steffes Michael W9,Hilner Joan E10,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA, lperdue@wfubmc.edu

2. Hagedorn Research Institute, Gentofte, Denmark

3. University of Alaska Anchorage College of Arts and Sciences, Integrated Sciences, Anchorage, AK, USA

4. Burnet Clinical Research Unit, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

5. Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

6. Benaroya Research Institute, Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, USA

7. Hagedorn Research Institute, Gentofte, Denmark, Department of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

8. Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

9. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA

10. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

Abstract

Background When collecting phenotypic data in clinics across the globe, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) used several techniques that ensured consistency, completeness, and accuracy of the data. Purpose The aim of this article is to describe the procedures used for collection, entry, processing, and management of the phenotypic data in this international study. Methods The T1DGC ensured the collection of high quality data using the following procedures throughout the entire study period. The T1DGC used centralized and localized training, required a pilot study, certified all data entry personnel, created standardized data collection forms, reviewed a sample of form sets quarterly throughout the duration of the study, and used a data entry system that provided immediate feedback to those entering the data. Results Due to the intensive procedures in developing the forms, the study was able to uphold consistency among all clinics and minimal changes were required after implementation of the forms. The train-the-trainer model was efficient and only a small number of clinics had to repeat a pilot study. The study was able to maintain a low percentage of missing data (<0.001%) and low duplicate data entry error rate (0.10%). Conclusions It is critical to provide immediate follow-up in order to reinforce training and ensure the quality of the data collected and entered. Clinical Trials 2010; 7: S46—S55. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3