Affiliation:
1. Boston College, Lynch School of Education, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
Abstract
Underpinning the technical gaze that dominates learning disabilities theory and practice is the assumption that learning disabilities are a pathology that resides in the heads of individual students, with the corollary that remedial efforts also focus on what goes on in the heads of students classified as learning disabled. This article begins with a critique of the ideology of individualism that situates individual success and failure in the heads of individuals as a means of introducing an alternative perspective—social constructivism—that locates learning and learning problems in the context of human relations and activity. Extended examples are used to illustrate how the performative aspects of learning disabilities emerge in the context of human relationships. The primary argument developed here is that one cannot be learning disabled on one's own. It takes a complex system of interactions performed in just the right way, at the right time, on the stage we call school to make a learning disability. The article concludes with a brief consideration of the instructional implications of a social constructivist stance.
Subject
General Health Professions,Education,Health(social science)
Reference20 articles.
1. Booth, T. (1998). The poverty of special education: Theories to the rescue? In C. Clark, A. Dyson, & A. Millward (Eds), Theorizing special education (pp. 79—89). London: Routledge.
2. What Learning Disability Does
Cited by
89 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献