Moving the LD Field Ahead

Author:

Adelman Howard S.1,Taylor Linda2

Affiliation:

1. Howard S. Adelman, PhD, is Professor of Psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles.

2. Linda Taylor, PhD, is a Clinical Psychologist, School Mental Health Services, Los Angeles Unified School District. Address: Howard S. Adelman, PhD, Department of Psychology, UCLA, 405 Hilgard Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90024.

Abstract

Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no path and leave a trail. Anonymous In this final article in the series on the future of the LD field, we reflect on ideas presented by the contributors and underscore trends for the the future that seem essential to the field's progress. Inadequacies of prevailing thinking in the field are highlighted and suggestions are offered about the way in which such thinking needs to be expanded and transformed. In this connection, we stress the importance of (a) an expanded focus on adolescents and adults, (b) broader models for understanding the patterns of behavior and learning seen in LD programs, (c) going beyond the concepts of diagnosis, treatment, remediation, and individualized instruction, (d) expansion of prevailing views of basic skills, and (e) development of interventions that focus on more than changing people. Finally, we explore implications of and ideas for reducing the large number of LD misdiagnoses. One purpose of this series has been to focus attention on the directions that have been established and where they are leading the field. Another purpose has been to encourage thought and discussion about new paths to follow. The rapid growth of the field has left precious little time for reflection, and it is easy to lose perspective under such circumstances. The series presentations provide a beginning for efforts to clarify an agenda for the immediate future; over the next year or so, we hope that the various LD journals will encourage an ongoing interchange about these and other ideas that should shape that agenda. It is from such an interchange that a new synthesis of guidelines and recommendations for theory, research, and practice can be developed by the field's advocates, representatives, and others who shape the future through then influence on policy and socialization of professionals and the general public. It is time to stimulate and broaden the dialectic process; the result should be a refreshing renewal of the spirit that prevailed when the field was born.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Health Professions,Education,Health (social science)

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3