Measuring Instructional Interactions During Reading Instruction for Students Receiving Intervention in Middle School

Author:

Baker Scott K.1,Kennedy Patrick C.1ORCID,Richards Dean2,Nelson Nancy J.3ORCID,Fien Hank3,Doabler Christian T.4

Affiliation:

1. University of Oregon, Eugene, USA

2. Bend-La Pine Schools, OR, USA

3. Boston University, MA, USA

4. The University of Texas-Austin, USA

Abstract

More than two-thirds of middle school students do not read proficiently. Research has shown that targeted interventions using explicit instruction methods can improve reading outcomes for struggling readers. A central feature of explicit instruction is the systematic implementation of instructional interactions, but it is not clear what specific instructional interaction practices lead to stronger outcomes for middle school readers. This study used a regression discontinuity design to compare the frequency and impact of instructional interactions experienced by eighth-grade students who received a targeted reading intervention ( n = 1,461) with those who did not ( n = 4,292). Results indicated that students who received intervention experienced far more instructional interactions with their teachers than did students who did not. However, the association between rates of interaction and student need in the intervention group was minimal, and the relationship between the rate of instructional interactions and reading growth was mixed. Implications for intervening with struggling students in the middle grades are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Health Professions,Education,Health (social science)

Reference52 articles.

1. Alonzo J., Tindal G. (2008). Examining the technical adequacy of fifth-grade reading comprehension measures in a progress monitoring assessment system (Technical Report No. 0807). Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531516.pdf

2. Alonzo J., Tindal G., Ulmer K., Glasgow A. (2006). easyCBM online progress monitoring assessment system. University of Oregon. http://easycbm.com

3. Anderson D., Alonzo J., Tindal G. (2011). easyCBM® reading criterion related validity evidence: Oregon state test (Technical Report No. 1103). Behavioral Research and Training, University of Oregon. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531665.pdf

4. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

5. effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3