Affiliation:
1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Abstract
The concept of science in the schoolhouse combines knowledge of research-based practices with the complexities of day-to-day life in schools. In this discussion, co-teaching is offered as an example of how advocacy for a practice can outpace the science that supports it. There is a push for co-teaching in contemporary schools, and special educators in great numbers are being asked to join with general educators in meeting the needs of students with disabilities. However, the science behind co-teaching to date is very limited. Studies have examined the implementation of co-teaching as a general service delivery option, but much less attention has been paid scientifically to the character and quality of the co-taught instruction or to the impact of co-teaching on student outcomes. Within this context, I also examine how Crockett's four recommendations to support science in the schoolhouse could address the questions about co-teaching for which there are few answers.
Subject
General Health Professions,Education,Health (social science)
Reference28 articles.
1. Teachers' Beliefs About Co-Teaching
2. Inclusion in Minnesota
3. Inclusion in Virginia
4. Collaborative Instruction: Is it an Effective Option for Inclusion in Secondary Classrooms?
5. Brophy, J.E. & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed. pp. 328—375). New York: Macmillan.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献