Concept-Focused and Procedure-Focused Instruction on the Algebra Performance of Grade 9 Students With and Without Mathematics Difficulty

Author:

Lee Jihyun1

Affiliation:

1. University of Wyoming, Laramie, USA

Abstract

Developing both conceptual and procedural knowledge is important for students’ mathematics competence. This study examined whether Grade 9 general education mathematics teachers’ self-reported use of concept-focused instruction (CFI) and procedure-focused instruction (PFI) were associated differently with ninth graders’ algebra achievement after 2.5 years, depending on students’ mathematics difficulty (MD) status. Data for this study were drawn from the High School Longitudinal Study for the years 2009–2010 and 2011–2012 ( N = 19,104). Multiple regression analyses indicated that students with MD who participated in Grade 9 mathematics classrooms where teachers self-reported the use of less CFI and more PFI were more positively associated with having higher algebra achievement after 2.5 years. Conversely, students without MD in classrooms where mathematics teachers self-reported the use of more CFI and less PFI were positively associated with having higher algebra achievement after 2.5 years. However, this study’s findings do not suggest that teachers should disregard CFI and provide only PFI when teaching students with MD. Because the data set did not include any variable to discover whether teachers provided sufficient support (i.e., evidence-based practices) for students with MD, who have more constraints in their cognitive skills compared to students without MD, to benefit from CFI, the findings of this study should be interpreted cautiously. Directions for future research and practical implications are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference82 articles.

1. Akram M., Zepeda S. J. (2015). Development and validation of a teacher self-assessment instrument. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 9(2), 134–148. https://www.ue.edu.pk/jrre/articles/92005.pdf

2. Anthony A., Michael E., Victoria O. (2012). Effect of self-instruction strategy on the achievement in algebra of students with learning difficulty in mathematics. US-China Education Review, 12, 1006–1021. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539351.pdf

3. Azzone G., Soncin M. (2020). Factors driving university choice: A principal component analysis on Italian institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2426–2438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1612354

4. Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data

5. Blazar D., Archer C. (2020). Teaching to support students with diverse academic needs. Educational Researcher, 49(5), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20931226

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3