Mobilizing the White: White Nationalism and Congressional Politics in the American South

Author:

Weiner Amanda1,Zellman Ariel2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Studies, Bar-Ilan University Faculty of Social Sciences, Ramat Gan, Israel

2. Department of Political Studies, Political Studies, Bar-Ilan University Faculty of Social Sciences, Ramat Gan, Israel

Abstract

To what extent do white nationalists influence Congressional representative conservatism? Although ethnocentrism, out-group prejudice, and racial threats strongly predict American political attitudes and voter behavior, how social movements predicated on these beliefs shape political outcomes is rarely considered. We argue that white nationalist activities significantly contribute to the radicalization of Congressional representatives’ policy agendas in a manner non-reducible to demographic or socioeconomic conditions. By mobilizing white voters against racial status threats, they indirectly compel politicians to adopt more radically conservative agendas. We quantitatively test these propositions by examining distributions of white nationalist groups in the American South against Congressional representative conservatism from 2010–2017. Analyses reveal that white nationalists indeed appear to significantly impact representative radical conservatism, even controlling for numerous factors commonly theorized to explain their rise. In doing so, we contribute to emerging insights on the political influence of the radical right on the contemporary American conservative “mainstream.”

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference129 articles.

1. Abramowitz A., McCoy J. (2019). United States: Racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in trump’s America. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218811309

2. Adamczyk A., Gruenewald J., Chermak S. M., Freilich J. D. (2014). The relationship between hate groups and far-right ideological violence. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(3), 310–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214536659

3. ADL (2019, January 23). Right-wing extremism linked to every 2018 extremist murder in the U.S., ADL finds. Anti-Defamation League. https://www.adl.org/news/press-releases/right-wing-extremism-linked-to-every-2018-extremist-murder-in-the-us-adl-finds.

4. ADL (2020). Extremists involved in nationwide protests against Coronavirus restrictions. Anti-Defamation League. https://www.adl.org/blog/extremists-involved-in-nationwide-protests-against-coronavirus-restrictions.

5. Akkerman T., Rooduijn M. (2015). Pariahs or partners? Inclusion and exclusion of radical right parties and the effects on their policy positions. Political Studies, 63(5), 1140–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12146

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3