Professional opinions and practices concerning Alcoholics Anonymous: a review of the literature and a research agenda-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Professional opinions and practices concerning Alcoholics Anonymous: a review of the literature and a research agenda

Published:1996-03 Issue:1 Volume:23 Page:93-111
ISSN:0091-4509
Container-title:Contemporary Drug Problems
language:en
Short-container-title:Contemporary Drug Problems

Author:

Ogborne Alan¹

Affiliation:

1. Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario (100 Collip Circle, Suite 200, London, Ontario N6G 4X8, Canada).

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Health (social science)

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/009145099602300109

Reference24 articles.

1. Anonymous (circa 1990). Comments on AA's triennial surveys.

2. The Efficacy of Alcoholics Anonymous: The Elusiveness of Hard Data

3. A.A. Ideology among Alcohol Treatment Directors

4. EllisK. & RushB.R. (1993). Alcohol and Other Drug Services in Ontario: Results of a Provincial Survey, 1992 Toronto, Addiction Research Foundation.

5. HumphreysK. MavisB.E. StofflemayerB.E. (1991). Substance abuse treatment agencies and self-help groups: Collaborators or competitors? Paper presented at the 99th annual convention of the APA.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. References;Circles of Recovery;2003-10-30

2. Epilogue: summing up, moving forward;Circles of Recovery;2003-10-30

3. How should government agencies, healthcare organization, and clinicians interact with self-help organizations?;Circles of Recovery;2003-10-30

4. A different perspective on change in self-help organizations: spirituality, identity, life stories, friendship networks, and politicization;Circles of Recovery;2003-10-30

5. Does self-help group participation lead to positive addiction-related, psychiatric, and medical outcomes?;Circles of Recovery;2003-10-30